Self-Sovereign Identity in Education

Self-sovereign identity (SSI) is a model of digital identity that gives people total control over their personal information and digital credentials. Due to the decentralized nature of SSI, users are free to control, share, and manage their digital identities on their own without the assistance of outside identity providers.

In the field of education, SSI has the potential to bring about a paradigm shift in the manner in which educational institutions manage the identities of students and teachers, as well as credentials and academic records. For students and teachers, SSI can be used to build a tamper-proof, transportable, and verifiable digital identity that can be used to authenticate their academic accomplishments, professional certifications, and personal information.

The use cases for SSI in education are varied and include everything from managing student data privacy and security to issuing and verifying academic credentials. For example, SSI can be put to use to generate a verifiable digital transcript for students. This transcript can then be distributed to prospective employers or educational institutions, which simplifies the process of applying for jobs and enrolling in schools.

The value of self-sovereign identity for academic credentials

Academic institutions can also use SSI to improve data privacy and security by giving students and teachers complete control over their personal data. Individuals have the ability to select which aspects of their personal information they wish to share, as well as with whom and for what purpose, when utilizing SSI. As a result, data privacy compliance with laws like GDPR and CCPA is not only ensured, but also improved.

The wider business community can also benefit from SSI in education. For instance, potential employers can use SSI to verify the academic credentials and professional certifications of candidates for employment, thereby lowering the risk of hiring individuals who do not meet the necessary requirements.

The difficulty of evaluating academic credentials and the lack of data privacy and security in conventional identity models are just two of the major issues that SSI implementation in education can address. The administrative burden of managing academic records can also be reduced with the help of SSI, which can also improve the effectiveness of the student recruitment and admissions processes.

Depending on the particular requirements of individual academic institutions, SSI can be implemented on a local, regional, or even an international scale. Local implementations can be used to manage the privacy and security of student data, whereas regional and international implementations can be used to streamline the recognition of academic credentials across borders and jurisdictions. Both types of implementations can be used in conjunction with one another.

Interoperability through standards

To support the adoption of SSI in the educational field, a number of standards and recommendations have surfaced, that can facilitate a more interoperable and versatile future within education, each with its own special values. Three of these standards are the EU's proposal for micro-credentials, Open Badges 3.0, and eIDAS 2.0.

eIDAS 2.0 is the second version of the Electronic Identification, Authentication, and Trust Services regulation in the European Union. Academic institutions can now issue and verify digital academic credentials across borders and jurisdictions thanks to the eIDAS 2.0 regulation, which recognizes SSI as a workable method of digital identification.

Open Badges 3.0 is a specification that was developed by the IMS Global Learning Consortium for the purpose of standardizing the process of issuing and verifying digital badges. SSI is utilised by Open Badges 3.0 by offering a standardized format for digital badges that can be kept and managed on a person's digital wallet. This gives users a portable and verifiable digital credential and enables them to manage and share their skills and qualification securely and seamlessly across various contexts and platforms.

Furthermore, the EU's proposal for micro-credentials aims to develop a framework for the recognition and validation of shorter, skill-focused learning experiences. By giving people a portable, verifiable, and tamper-proof digital identity, the proposal recognizes the potential of SSI to improve the recognition and validation of micro-credentials. Individuals would be able to show potential employers and educational institutions their skills and competencies with ease in this way.

Driving adoption through academic integrations

Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) is becoming more widely acknowledged as a workable solution as academic institutions look to update their systems, providing several benefits to the academic sector. However, in order to begin evaluating and implementing SSI technology, institutions must take actionable steps.

Academic institutions should first educate themselves on SSI and its potential uses in the field of education. Developing a thorough understanding of SSI's technical components, the various standards and protocols, and the potential advantages and difficulties of SSI implementation. Institutions can use this information to decide how to use technology to its fullest potential.

The next step is to pinpoint the precise use cases where SSI can be beneficial. In order to facilitate safe and effective data sharing, SSI can be utilized, for instance, to manage student identity and credentials. Additionally, it can support the acceptance and legitimacy of non-conventional forms of education like micro-credentials. Academic institutions can more clearly understand how SSI can be used in their particular context by identifying use cases that are consistent with institutional goals.

It is then possible to begin testing and implementing SSI solutions once specific use cases have been identified. Partnering with SSI providers can assist institutions in evaluating the viability and efficacy of SSI in particular contexts, such as student enrolment or career development. Conducting such pilot projects can help institutions to explore the value SSI brings to each unique context.

After the testing and evaluation, academic institutions can further work with other education sector stakeholders to encourage the adoption of SSI standards and protocols. A policy framework that encourages the use of SSI in the academic sector can be developed by collaborating with consortiums, industry associations, and governmental organizations.

Summary

The provision of a safe, decentralized, and portable digital identity solution for students and teachers is one of the many ways in which SSI has the potential to revolutionize the educational system, addressing a number of significant issues that are present in conventional identity models, thereby enhancing data privacy and security as well as the effectiveness of academic procedures.

With current educational challenges being addressed by standards and proposals like eIDAS 2.0, Open Badges 3.0, and the EU proposal for micro-credentials. Through the implementation and wider adoption of such standards and recommendations, the education ecosystem could become more interoperable, effective, safe, and transparent. Providing advantages for, not only, academic institutions, teachers, and students, but also the wider communities and business as a whole.

‍